Monday, October 10, 2005

Productivity 101

Well, the brain-washing advertising is beginning. I request only that the Howard government leave me a few of my happy memories of childhood before they erase everything.



Now that we're going to be forced to increase productivity in order to get any sort of wage increase, let's be realistic, and look into ways to do this.

Time is money. Productivity is time, or work units, over money.
To put it another way, productivity is how close your wage is to zero, for any set amount of work in a given time.

Walking.

This is an inefficient, and quite commonplace method of transportation. As healthy as it may be, there is a potential productivity gain by encouraging employees to sprint from place to place. Running can be considered healthier than walking, higher impact considerations aside. Studies show that the average employee walks between 0.5 and 3% of the day, some as high as 50% - the median sitting around 1.25%.

The speed increase, and this is considered on the basis that stretching is done in the employee's own time, is considerable - averaging at roughly twice as fast. There is a median productivity saving of 1.25%.

Sleep.

With the prevalence of unpaid overtime about to increase, sleep is a redundant luxury. ‘Crunch-time’ periods of necessary high productivity are widespread – these are hampered by the extended breaks required through slumber. Techniques and medications to avoid sleep requirements during intense work periods are nothing new. Pseudoephedrine and caffeine tablets are all available locally, and presently are frequently used in the heavy vehicle transportation industry, for example.

Compensation payments can be made to offset the medication side effects and any illness risk (mostly this would be of the psychological variety.) Recent pharmaceutical advances can also be used to counteract the effects, many often ‘elated’ with the results within hours. Studies show that sleep costs the manufacturing industry $5.7 billion in exports a year.

Eating/Drinking.

The advent of drip-feed nutrient or fluid distribution has been used in the medical industry for some time, and is nothing new. 1 in 2 people will be hydrated or fed via a ‘drip’ at some stage in their lives. Focus groups have shown that public perception of automated consumption is at record levels of acceptance. Break periods, used for rest and sustenance, cost Australian companies millions of man-hours each week.

Bathroom Activities.

Currently there is a phase of people’s lives that is spent unable to control either bowel or bladder. For most, this occurs early and again towards the end, and requires measures that benefit both hygiene, and work flow. Interruptions to continuous operations process workers, for example, can be incredibly costly – halting an entire line. Measures to avoid this situation are cheap, easily obtainable, and don’t inhibit lifestyle. These would include, but not limited to, nappies, bedpans at workstations, or extended open communal troughs. The productivity benefits of constipation should also not be overlooked.

Illness/Injury.

Cures are elusive, and expensive. Painkillers, on the other hand, in combination with placebos, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, etc, can be issued by supervisors at low cost, to ensure work continues despite any perceived pain, distress or injury. There are many scenarios in which complete ignorance from pain (commonly known as a stupor) can improve worker performance during these difficult periods. In most cases, even severed limbs or digits can be placed on ice until the workers shift ends, and reattached outside working hours without risk.

Social Activities.

Socializing and talking take up too large a portion of working hours. Apart from the obvious simple draconian silence rules to enforce a reduction, other possible solutions could be: a decrease in media stimuli, in order to diminish the number of topics people feel the need to discuss – this can be addressed by a nationwide ignorance of politics, news, etc brought upon by ‘fluff’ infotainment of little substance (see News Limited’s great strides in this area.) The ability to read and write also is shown to have a negative effect to efficiency.

Hygiene.

Industry loses millions of work hours to hand washing, decontamination and other hygiene reasons. Respect for health and safety will need to diminish into insignificance over time for output rates to increase, but workers may need to be occasionally deloused, hosed down, etc to prevent costly disease and time lost from deaths.

Motivation.

The following chart shows studies done overseas to determine the effectiveness of corporate violence on the individual:

Productivity

These ‘civil liberties’, often blown out of proportion in popular media, are obviously disadvantageous to productivity. In order to avoid any backlash from liberty loss, the population may need to be distracted, and reforms introduced over time, with some vaguely suitable reason appropriated.

Automation.

Human muscle is, and in the foreseeable future, cheaper and more efficient than any form of automated robotics. This is only the case once heavy pressure is applied.

Holidays.

Holidays should be abolished, but over a period of time.

Genetic modification.

Glycolytic muscles, for example, are superior, and should be genetically engineered where appropriate into employee clones. Preferably, these clones could be purchased from a suitable biotechnology company. Work needs to be done on this early, as even with growth hormones, and other escalation techniques to speed the gestation period, there will be some lead-time. Modification to existing employees might have to suffice in the interim, until suitable units can be manufactured.

Human beings themselves, although for lack of want of sentimentality they should hereon in be referred to as human resources, seem to be the ideal genetic base for workers. History has shown them to be the easiest to subdue, as all other existing creatures always retain at least some respect for their own freedoms when all should at that point seem hopeless – from horses bucking, to dogs escaping, to elephants and orcas snapping.

Workers should be working 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with zero faults, at the highest possible rate, given the limitations of muscle exhaustion, lactic acid build-up, overheating, speed of light, etc.

If we take the above measures, I am confident we can all manage to gain some wage increases through these productive ideas.

9 Comments:

At 1:02 pm, October 11, 2005, Blogger Sarah said...

Yep, half of us are already working long hours under poor conditions in soul-destroying jobs while prozacked up to the eyeballs, now it's the turn of the old-fashioned recalcitrants who value life above work!

 
At 6:03 pm, October 11, 2005, Blogger Larry Bonewend said...

Indeed morton - the 'administration' here wants to know if theres any room on that flag for one more star?

Health insurance is a bit of a tough one, Howard has tried to destroy public heathcare with all his might, but now seems to be rather keen on it - can't let the proles go dying on us in between shifts I guess.

Restaraunt workers are on the way out, for some reason everyone's eating-in nowadays, can't help but wonder why, it's not as if they have time to cook anything. Must be because no one can afford anything.

In my experience, only a handful of workers knock-back overtime on any sort of regular basis. Average is about 14 hours a week, some do a lot more. They can't be convinced to spend more time at home, to see their children more than a few hours on weekdays, if at all, because they need to to survive.

Most are up shit creek, and the shit floodgates are about to be opened.

 
At 11:39 pm, October 11, 2005, Blogger Mikey_Capital said...

It seems according to Mr Watermelon that the ideal worker platform would be those good filled coccoons from the Matrix.

They look quite comfie too...

I want to know how they measure productivity anyway? Is it actual outputs or just people trying to look busy. I know that I look very busy to people a lot of the time - and that the George trick of being angry makes you sound like you are working very hard. Normally I'm swearing cause I'm playing Dungeon's and Dragons via email and one of my carefully written turns just tanked.

Man I am so glad I am an office drone. I look at supermarket people and think I get paid twice as much as you for about 1/5th of the effort. No wonder I'm a socialist. Even I recognise that ain't fair.

 
At 10:52 am, October 12, 2005, Blogger Aleks - Anarcho-Syndicalist said...

One way to elimiate people wasting time eating their meals is to feed everybody Soylent Green tablets.

Oh and I have to disgree with you Larry, Howard still wants to get rid of the the public Health system; he's just more cunning in the way he does it.

Sorry Mikey, I can't resist this; if you are a socialist, why are you a member of a free-market capitalism party like the ALP?

 
At 2:34 pm, October 12, 2005, Blogger Gam said...

What's wrong with free market capitalism? I mean you can still be a socialist and support it. Free market capitalism is inherently dangerous, like fire, but properly controlled one can achieve diverse beneficial aims with it.

 
At 10:21 pm, October 12, 2005, Blogger Mikey_Capital said...

I concur. You can be socialistic in principle and recognise the benefits of a free market.

But not a out of control market. And not one that's not free. Like the tariffs the US uses to prop up company farms that produce lakes of pig shit.

That's just wrong.

BTW - I thought about joining the Greens but their Defence policies were a tad unrealistic to me.

And yes you can be a good socialist and back having a strong military that can be sent out to do things like stop failing states like PNG and the Solomons falling in a heap

 
At 10:51 pm, October 12, 2005, Blogger Larry Bonewend said...

I think that's the inherant problem, the reigns aren't being tightened at all anymore. Quite the opposite.

In a way, I'm glad we can finally begin to compete with China on wages, etc. It will bring the hidden slavery home.

And Barnaby today - crossing the floor on disgusting trade practices changes. Apparently it's just too hard to create monopolies.

Who the hell is going to restrict this in anyway? I don't see any fire-breaks being sparked up.

 
At 11:09 pm, October 12, 2005, Blogger Larry Bonewend said...

And for Mikey, I'll grab a few policies I don't think are too unrealistic, and are desperately needed.

2.9 global regime initiatives to monitor and reduce, and eliminate the manufacture
and export of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons technologies

(I really don't see how even the US can claim to need biological weapons)

2.12 a global ban on the militarisation of space, including the United States of
America’s (US) plan for the development of an anti-missile defence capability,
and strenuously oppose any Australian involvement

(Star wars, don't need to say more.)

2.14 an increased Australian role in repair and clean-up of all sites affected by
chemical or persistently dangerous weapons.

(I guess that means mines - did it in Iraq, why not continue? Big world brownie points possible in those nasty terrorist countries right there. Diana would be proud.)

2.60 oppose the use of ADF personnel in strikebreaking activities or in countering
demonstrations

(Fuck oath)

2.69 protecting the rights of conscientious objectors not to participate in war-related
activities.

(I was thinking of getting this as a tattoo - 'Do Not Conscript')

2.53 the strengthening of the UN role as a global organisation of conflict management and peacekeeping, while noting that, where prevention fails and in situations of structural and massive violations of human rights and/or genocide, the use of
force may be justified if it is the only means of preventing further human rights violations and suffering, provided that it is used under a mandate from the UN.

(Wouldn't this mean we would have already GONE to Iraq by now - as well as Dafur?)

 
At 11:17 pm, October 14, 2005, Blogger Mikey_Capital said...

Ok then. Let's check out this little number from the Greens (and remember - I like them a lot).

The Greens would:
• Immediately withdraw Australian troops from
Iraq and provide significant aid for Iraqi national
reconstruction

[Bad idea. Iraq needs the UK, US, and Oz in there are the moment. Yep they f_cked up. But we were part of the f_ck up and have a responsibility to stay until the others go]

• Cancel arms contracts that further entrench the
Australian defence forces within the US alliance,
such as new tanks, expensive fighter aircraft and
new warships

[Unfortunately much of the yank gear we need. To maintain interoperability for those peace keeping missions we're fond of - and because our platforms are rapidly approaching end of life. The yank stuff alas is the best there is.]

• Support a real peace process for Israel and
Palestine as a prerequisite for peace across the
Middle East

[No issue with that]

• Require parliamentary approval before any
overseas military deployment

[Hmm, could be a problem on occassion. But then the Greens came up with this when the govt did not have the senate. So it's a moot point now]

• Reduce the levels of defence spending while
maintaining an adequate defence force

[We're bare to the bone. If we cut spending we lose capability. It's as simple as that. Our Defence spending is about 1.9% of GNP. In the UK it's about 2.4% - having come down from 4%. As CDF Baker once said the entire Defence force would only fill half the SCG]

 

Post a Comment

<< Home